About This Article

This article explains how Ontario’s statutory deductible on non-pecuniary (pain and suffering) awards after motor-vehicle accidents operates, where it came from, and why it matters now. After clearing the verbal threshold (permanent, serious impairment), plaintiffs who win general damages still face a deductible that is indexed annually to CPI by FSRA. For 2025 the deductible is $46,790.05 and the no-deductible threshold is $155,965.54 (Family Law Act: $23,395.04 and $77,982.13). The piece traces the deductible’s growth from its 1990s origins through legislative changes in the 1990s and 2003, and CPI linkage in 2015, setting out the statutory authority. Key Ontario Court of Appeal decisions (Cobb; El-Khodr; Cadieux) are summarized to show how deductibles and collateral-benefit set-offs can erode jury awards, sometimes reducing recoveries to zero even after a favorable verdict. Using FSRA’s indexation guidance and likely inflation paths, the article projects the deductible will cross $50,000 by around 2029–2030. The conclusion offers practical guidance for mediators and counsel: prioritize evidence and settlement positions that get damages over the statutory monetary threshold, because otherwise sizeable jury wins may be sharply reduced at judgment.

A Painful History:

Ontario’s Deductible and the Price of Suffering
by Shawn Patey ~ Mediator

What the deductible is—and isn’t

If you sue for pain and suffering (non-pecuniary damages) after a motor-vehicle accident in Ontario, your award is subject to a statutory deductible unless it exceeds a moving monetary threshold.

Both numbers are indexed each January 1 by FSRA[1] using the Canada Consumer Price Index[2] or “CPI” (September-to-September).

For January 1–December 31, 2025, the monetary threshold is $155,965.54 and the deductible is $46,790.05; Family Law Act s. 61(2)(e) claims have a $77,982.13 threshold and $23,395.04 deductible (FSRA, 2025 Indexation Guidance, Appendix 1–2) (FSRA 2025 Guidance)[3].

The authority to publish and index these figures comes from the Insurance Act s. 267.5(8.5) [4] and O. Reg. 461/96 s. 5.1[5].

To even get to non-pecuniary damages, a plaintiff must clear the statutory verbal threshold (permanent serious impairment of an important physical, mental or psychological function). That test is in s. 267.5(5) of the Insurance Act[6] and has been the battleground for decades[7].

Where the deductible came from (and how governments changed it) 

Ontario introduced a statutory deductible during the 1990s auto-reform era. I was a young lawyer on Bay Street during this time and recently wrote a blog about those transformative years, “Policy, Practice, and the Potholes in Between: A Mediator’s Firsthand Journey Through 35 Years of Ontario Auto Insurance Reform”[8].

In 1990, Ontario introduced the Ontario Motorist Protection Plan, which created the statutory verbal threshold restricting who could recover for motor vehicle injuries, though it did not yet impose a deductible.

Under Bill 164 (1994) the deductible was $10,000, then Bill 59 (1996) increased it to $15,000.

In 2003, the Regulation was amended to $30,000 (and $15,000 for Family Law Act claims), applicable to accidents on/after October 1, 2003; see historical version of O. Reg. 461/96 s. 5.1 stating “the amount of $30,000 is prescribed” (O. Reg. 461/96 – v2).

In 2015, the government tied the deductible and the threshold to annual CPI indexation and raised them going forward (O. Reg. 221/15)[9].

FSRA now publishes the updated numbers each year; 2025’s indexation rate is 1.6% (FSRA 2025 Guidance)[10].

What the appellate courts have said about applying it

The Court of Appeal’s Cobb v. Long Estate, 2017 ONCA 717[11]and El-Khodr v. Lackie, 2017 ONCA 716[12]decisions cemented how deductibles and collateral-benefit set-offs are applied to modern jury verdicts.

In Cobb, a jury’s non-pecuniary award of $50,000 was subject to the deductible of the day, slashing the recovery and, together with collateral-benefit deductions, drastically reducing the judgment[13].

El-Khodr dealt with how to match and deduct SABs against tort awards, read alongside Cadieux v. Cloutier, 2018 ONCA 903[14]. See my recent Substack, SABs, Silos, and the End of “Apples to Apples”: Lessons from Cadieux.  

Bottom line: even “successful” plaintiffs can see general damages reduced to nil if the award sits below the deductible figure applicable at the time of judgment.

Today’s numbers and the trajectory to $50,000

For 2025, the deductible is $46,790.05 (no deductible if the non-pecuniary award tops $155,965.54). Family Law Act numbers are $23,395.04 and $77,982.13, respectively (FSRA 2025 Guidance)[15].

When will the deductible cross $50,000?

Each year FSRA adjusts the deductible based on inflation measured from September to September. If inflation stays close to the Bank of Canada’s 2% target[16], the current $46,790 deductible will rise to about $50,000 by 2029. With the lower 1.6% rate used for 2025, it would reach $50,000 around 2030. In short, the deductible is in the high-$40,000s now and will likely cross into the $50,000s by the end of the decade unless inflation changes significantly.

A sober reality check for settlement strategy 

Two hard truths flow from the regime:

  1. Below-threshold wins can still feel like losses once the deductible is applied, as Cobb makes painfully clear for jury trials[17].
  2. The deductible is climbing every January with CPI. With FSRA’s indexation formula and the Bank of Canada’s 2% midpoint goal, expect a deductible over $50,000 by 2029 (or ~2030 at a 1.6% path), absent a material shock to the economy.

That’s the landscape mediators and counsel have to navigate: push for evidence that moves the case over the threshold and, where warranted, over the threshold number—or recognize that below-threshold valuations will be discounted by tens of thousands of dollars before ink hits judgment.

1. https://www.fsrao.ca/
2. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/subjects-start/prices_and_price_indexes/consumer_price_indexes
3. https://www.fsrao.ca/industry/auto-insurance/regulatory-framework/guidance-auto-insurance/2025-automobile-insurance-indexation-amounts-guidance
4. https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90i08
5. https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/960461
6. https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90i08
7. https://www.oba.org/motor-vehicle-personal-injury-claims-and-small-claims-court-important-lessons-about-the-deductible/
8. https://pateymediations.com/policy-practice-and-the-potholes-in-between/
9. https://canadianunderwriter.ca/news/claims/no-fault-deductibles-in-ontarios-insurance-act-in-tort-claims-for-auto-accidents-amended/
10. https://www.fsrao.ca/industry/auto-insurance/regulatory-framework/guidance-auto-insurance/2025-automobile-insurance-indexation-amounts-guidance
11. https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/2017/2017onca717/2017onca717.html?resultId=892f9de059e44d5facf4fc2fbda5d2fe&searchId=2025-08-19T04:19:02:839/61a5bc2ba8134bd7904d6295762fdc54
12. https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/2017/2017onca716/2017onca716.html?resultId=c47c894715b94d03a6feeab8580d7ce4&searchId=2025-08-19T04:20:55:004/2d49ba16e9a24697aa3008a1f67442b4
13. https://canliiconnects.org/en/summaries/46727
14. https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/2018/2018onca903/2018onca903.html?resultId=e8092f2148f446e197b11d089f692c61&searchId=2025-08-19T04:31:46:877/79500cf4926b4bb2aef452f3c8e7c0cc
15. https://www.fsrao.ca/industry/auto-insurance/regulatory-framework/guidance-auto-insurance/2025-automobile-insurance-indexation-amounts-guidance
16. https://www.bankofcanada.ca/core-functions/monetary-policy/inflation/
17. https://canliiconnects.org/en/summaries/46727

Share This Article

The content on this website, including blog posts, articles, and downloadable materials, is provided for general informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended to be legal advice, does not create a solicitor-client relationship, and should not be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer.